![]() Not every user requires every little thing on the screen to be filmed, but there are no other options.Can create menus and index longer presentations.In the editing mode, you can see where in the movie callouts and other effects appear and move them to other parts of the timeline by dragging.Lots of different choices for the appearance of callouts (captions).Isn’t as much of a memory hog as Captivate.Zoom and pan function allows the creator to focus on an area of interest that the user may not have seen otherwise.Great for filming exactly what you do, with the exact same timing as how you filmed it.Captivate has really raised the bar on usability. But the fact that I couldn’t figure those things out is telling. There were things I couldn’t find in each program that I may just have been unable to find. Remember that I’ve only used each of these programs a few days each. Here, in my view, are the pros and cons of Camtasia and Captivate. But I don’t believe it’s the best thing for information literacy tutorials. It’s great for filming every detail, which is good for technical support or product demos that don’t require a great deal of polish. I think it’s great as a video capture tool, but not so great as a video editing tool. Sure, I’ve encountered some problems with Captivate - particularly in terms of compression - but I think those problems are pretty common.Ĭamtasia has its strong points. And the interactive components available in Captivate make it an ideal program to use in creating information literacy tutorials. I never once had to look at the help file in Captivate. The editing interface is intuitive and allows the creator to easily change the pace, visual elements, and audio elements. Captivate has so many ways to customize how the screen is recorded and what on the screen is recorded. It took no time for me to understand how to make excellent screencasts using Captivate, while with Camtasia, I found myself unable to even get satisfactory answers from the help file. It’s not that I don’t like Camtasia Studio, but once I tried Macromedia Captivate, it became obvious to me that - all other things (price) being equal - Captivate was far superior. But I really did want to like Camtasia, and not only because it would be far cheaper to buy an upgrade of Camtasia than to buy any other software. I knew that the tutorial/demo creation software had become more sophisticated, so I wanted to explore other offerings. When I started to become interested in screencasting, I began to think about what I wanted to use to create my own screencasts or tutorials. While there were certainly a number of problems with the software, it gave us what we wanted, and we were pretty satisfied. Note: This review is from 2005 and is not relevant to current versions of Camtasia and Captivate.Ī few years ago, my husband bought Camtasia 1.1 so that we could create software demos for his business.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |