And a bright 6.1-inch display lets you see your photos clearly, even in bright light. The Tensor G2 chipset powers a number of impressive features like the Magic Eraser tool for removing unwanted people and Photo Unblur for cleaning up older images. But low-light photos are excellent and the portrait mode is tops, making this a great camera phone for the money. The Pixel 7a tends to favor dark colors which don't always serve it well in every scenario. That means more light provinding more detail to shots, and the result is a camera phone that's neck and neck with the Galaxy A54 among budget devices. For this model, Google has done away with the 12.2MP main camera and added a 64MP sensor that's physically larger than before. ![]() Google's Pixel 7a continues the fine tradition of Pixel A phones offering a superlative camera experience, except this time the hardware deserves as much credit as Google's computational photography and AI-powered photo processing. Even so, the Pixel 7 Pro is an incredible camera phone, certainly the best in the Android camp. We noticed some extra face smoothing in our testing, while the iPhone reproduced more facial details. The Pixel 7 Pro’s 10.8MP front camera also lags behind Apple, especially in dimmer settings. ![]() Apple still had the upper hand on color reproduction in telephoto images, even if it tops out at 3x optical zoom. The Pixel 7 Pro keeps the same 50MP main and 12MP ultrawide sensors as the Pixel 6 Pro, but that’s just fine.įrom the main and ultrawide cameras, pictures look stunning, matching and/or besting the iPhone 14 Pro (which shares the same camera system as the iPhone 14 Pro Max) in a lot of scenarios. This phone improves upon its predecessor in many key ways (except for battery life), including offering a 5x optical zoom on its telephoto lens. It won't however, impress you running next to a Core i7 MacBook Pro.Īpples to Oranges? We are comparing an iOS mobile device with 4G of RAM running iOS apps to an OS X device with 8G to 16G of RAM running OS X apps.Coming in hot right behind the iPhone 14 Pro Max is the Pixel 7 Pro, Google’s latest flagship. However, if CPU crunching is your need, it could be a substitute for the 12" MacBook. If graphic speed is your passion, at least if our limited testing with and OpenGL benchmark, it could be argued that the iPad Pro matches or exceeds the performance of any Apple laptop. Shockingly, the iPad Pro's framerate for the Manhattan OpenGL animation is faster than the fastest 15" MacBook Pro with M370X GPU! And the framerate for the T-Rex OpenGL animation is almost as fast. ![]() (The top 2.8GHz MacBook Pro 15" Quad-Core i7 2.8GHz was not included but, in case you are curious, it's Geekbench Multi-Core score was 15165.) The Multi-Core Score is essentially the same as the top 12" MacBook with 1.3GHz Core M but slower than the MacBook Air and 13" MacBook Pro. The Geekbench 3 Single-Core Score for the iPad Pro beats the fastest 12" MacBook Retina but scores behind the two MacBook Pros - which is as it should be. IPhone 6s Plus = iPhone 6s Plus with A9 chip ( HIGHER number means FASTER.)ġ5" MacBook Pro = Mid 2015 Macbook Pro 15" with 2.8GHz Core i7 and AMD Radeon R9 M370Xġ3" MacBook Pro = Early 2015 Macbook Pro 13" with 3.1GHz Core i7 and Intel HD Graphics 6100ġ3" MacBook Air = Early 2015 Macbook Pro 13" with 2.2 GHz Core i7 and Intel HD Graphics 6000ġ2" MacBook = Early 2015 MacBook Retina 12" with 1.2GHz or 1.3GHz Core M and Intel HD Graphics 5300 ![]() We ran the Manhattan and T-Rex animations off screen at 1080p in all cases. GFXBench 3 measures the OpenGL performance of both iOS and OS X devices.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |